Uncategorized


Welcome to Peru – land of plenty, realm of remarkable diversity, and cradle of ancient civilizations!  And yes, that man beside you on the bus is holding a live chicken.  Play your cards right and you might get to eat a foot.  It’s true that in some ways Peru is behind the times, just now experiencing radical breakthroughs like asphalt and dentistry, but if you look past all that you’ll see a beautiful country full of amiable people, and then if you look past that and over to the left you’ll see an old woman defecating in the middle of the street.  You may be thinking, “Nick, is the humor of this entire article going to be essentially based on making fun of their poverty?”  Well I’d make fun of the mentally disabled, but I can’t seem to find any.  Maybe there aren’t any here because it’s too hard to learn Spanish.  (Or I could’ve said: Maybe they can’t afford them here.)

 

Peru is most well-known for its archaeological treasures, having been home to the Incans, the Moche, the Nazca, and several dozen other cultures mainly distinguishable by the slightly different shaped necks of their jars (this is not a joke).  And sometimes distinguishable by their funny hats (still not a joke).  And even less frequently distinguishable by their preference for regular or low-fat Hot Pockets (there’s the joke).  Indeed Peru seems littered with the citadels and cities of complicated and diverse cultures, citadels and cities that all ultimately look like a big pile of rocks.  In fact I’m pretty sure I have some Incan ruins beside my house from the leftover materials when we installed a new fireplace.  The level of decay in most of these archaeological sites allows near infinite interpretation by natives and experts regarding their purpose.  Those diagonal stones are meant to represent the eyes of a puma, or that boulder is meant to represent the surrounding countryside (and I think that cloud looks like a pony!).  Also, no ruin would be complete without a room or relic that is positioned to highlight the solstices, because for some reason ancient Peruvians were fascinated with the only quasi-holiday more boring than Flag Day.  But gazing upon the awe-inspiring sites of Machu Picchu or Kuelap, one can’t help but wonder one thing: if these civilizations were so mighty, how were they beaten by a people who like to nap between 1:00 PM and 4:00 PM every day for no particular reason?

 

But enough about ancient history – who are the Peruvians of today?  Who are these short, dark-skinned persons who take much better care of their hair than their teeth?  It’s a difficult question that many have unsuccessfully attempted to answer, but I think I finally have an adequate response: they are people who want to sell you shit.  Candy, cigarettes, history books, jungle medicines, popcorn, bundt cake, directions, photos of themselves, photos of you, photos of just about anything else, haircuts, shoeshines, or even, if you are very very lucky, your own wallet back to you.  Or maybe they’re a whole nation of people unsure of exactly how to finish building a house (hint: add a roof, paint it, research “plumbing”).  Or maybe they’re people who can magically secrete dirt, because how else could their cities be so damn dusty?  I feel like an extra in Hidalgo.  Anyway, in Peru people who dress and live much like those of us in first world countries and people stuck two hundred years in the past exist side by side.  In nearly every town you can see women clothed in traditional garb: colorful sweaters, stiff hats, and thick skirts and stockings, usually with a bulging hand-woven sack slung over their shoulders.  These sacks can contain anything; I have personally seen them opened to reveal several pounds of bananas, a baby, and once a TV/VCR combo (seriously).  They’re like a miniature version of Showcase Showdown, only without Bob Barker.

 

            Arguably the best way to get a feel for the Peruvian way of life is to sample their transportation structure, which is mostly based on the “Hey you!  Give me a ride!” system.  This method works even better if you have a gun, but be warned, in rural locales you might have to first explain what exactly a gun is.  Within cities, colectivos and combis are the main form of transportation.  These are colorfully painted vans and small buses whose drivers attract attention by shouting constantly out the window.  I know what you’re thinking – Nick, I’m pretty sure you’re describing an ice cream truck – but trust me, the only ice cream they carry is seventy nine, wears a poncho, and tries to sell you fried cow hearts.  People are crammed into colectivos and combis quite densely, and thus the best way to climb on is with some healthy shoving (if you push hard enough to send any pregnant women aboard into forced labor you know you’ve gotten the hang of it).  Conversely, there are two ways to get off – either hurl yourself out the door or go into a claustrophobia-induced panic attack.  I recommend the latter as it requires less apologizing.  For long distance hauls, Peru has an extensive bus network, most of which offer food and screen staff-selected films, giving you the ideal opportunity to catch up on Tom Berringer and Dolph Lundgren movies.  It’s always best to hit yourself in the kneecaps with a hammer before boarding any buses so that the seat’s miniscule legroom seems pleasant by comparison.

 

Peruvian cuisine is as intriguing as their transportation (and will likely move through you faster than any local bus moves from town to town).  Peruvians often begin their meal with a hodgepodge soup made of things they have no use for, like chicken bones, corn cobs, or birth control pills.  The same advice applies to these soups as walking a tightrope – don’t look down.  From there it’s a main dish of beef, pork, chicken, or fish usually served with both rice and French fries.  It was in fact a major scientific discovery in Peru that they could combine rice and potatoes, forming a meal starchier than my dry cleaning, and people would not complain (up their with the discovery that those big squares of grass in front of people’s houses are great places to pile trash).  A delicacy of the highlands is cuy, guinea pig in English, which takes second place for cutest dinner right after Nepal’s sautéed puppy in a sailor hat.  Then there’s ceviche, the nationally adored dish of raw seafood marinated in lime juice, oil, and spices and peppers, prepared differently by each cevicheria.  I don’t really have anything funny to say; ceviche is actually quite delicious.  What, you still want a joke?  Okay -  it seems that every single person in Peru owns a travel agency.  In fact, the Peruvian Statistics Bureau reports that there are 3 agencies for every 10 tourists.  But they also report that 49 percent of their statistics are made up, since the Peruvian Statistics Bureau is really just one guy named Luis who “usually knows what’s up.”

 

            Peruvians emphasize their beverages as much as their food.  The national drink is chicha, a mildly fermented corn juice traditionally made by corn being chewed and then spit into a vat by elderly women.  By traditionally made I mean probably still made that way, but I don’t want to find out.  And if you ask politely, the women may bypass the middleman and spit right into your mouth, but this could be a ceremony that results in you acquiring a wife.  Or maybe that was just something I saw on Star Trek.  The equally famous alcoholic beverage of the country is the pisco sour.  An ongoing debate exists as to whether pisco originated in Chile or Peru, an issue most Peruvians are quite passionate about.  If caught up in the argument, make sure you pretend that it’s more interesting than the sour apple versus watermelon Jolly Rancher debate.  Finally, on a hot day most Peruvians reach for an Inca Kola, the yellow, sugary soda of choice.  The best thing about Inca Kola is the universal free refills.  When you finish your glass just head to the toilet, aim carefully, and after relieving yourself you’ll have another full bottle.

 

            So there you have it: Peru, land of promise!  Hop the next plane out!  Only be warned, the planes here are covered in hair, have long necks, and are called ‘llamas’ (it’s a regional dialect).  On the long trip over you can practice some key phrases, such as, “What part of this pig is this from exactly?” “Does your toilet have a toilet?” and “You read my mind, I am interested in a 13-year old prostitute with more children than incisors.”  Bon voyage!

Wow, I haven’t posted in over a month…bums yo.  Here’s some theology by John Scottus Eriugena, 9th century man of mystery (mainly just something I find interesting, so don’t expect real analysis also I don’t have the space/time/inclination to explain all the aspects of people’s thought so I apologize for any lack of clarity):

Eriugena’s model of the incarnation really can’t be divorced from his anthropology, so here are some basic points that are necessary in order to understand his thought on this matter:

  • In Eriugena’s thought, an idea has an actual, and more perfect, reality within the mind.
  • All of creation is contained within the mind of God, who creates through a sort of divine self-knowledge or theophany.
  • Humanity, since it is created in God’s image, likewise contains all of creation within itself.
  • The Fall was not an actual historical event; man was never in paradise and the Fall is, in effect, the first stage on the return to God.   Since creation is contained within man, it fell (as in it needs to return to God) as well.

So, what’s the purpose of Christ in this system?  Given his understanding of sin and the Fall, Eriugena obviously doesn’t assert the Thomistic understanding that w/o sin there would have been no need for Christ.  Instead, Eriugena utilizes an eastern conception of the incarnation (drawn from Gregory of Nyssa by way of Maximus, and showing strong Maximusian(?) influence).  From the Periphyseon:

N. Why did He [Christ] descend?

A.  Tell me, I pray.

N. For this reason only, I think: that in His humanity He might save the effects of the Causes which in His Divinity He possesses eternally without change; and that He Might call them back into their Causes that they might be preserved in them by a mystical unification, just as the Causes also are preserved.  By this is meant that if the Wisdom of God did not descend into the effects of the Causes which enjoy everlasting life in it, the priciple of the Causes would perish: for no Cause could survive the destruction of the effects of the Causes, any more than the effects could survive the destruction of their Causes.

So what does that lump of text really mean?  Basically, the Incarnation is understood as a neccessary event required to reincorporate the “effects of the Causes”, namely the world and everything in it, into God.  If Christ didn’t do this then the effects would eventually fade away (as everything on this Earth is understood to be transitory) and the causes themself would therefore cease to exist.  However, since these causes exist in God, they cannot pass away.  Hence, Chirst = neccessary.  All of creation is present in man.  So Christ’s descent (Incarnation = descent in Eriugena.  Interesting but not unique, really) unifies the Divine Causes with their effects (creation).  Christ, therefore, contains all nature, divine and human intertwined in a mirror of the Hypostatic Union (this is clearly reminiscent of Maximus, who was extremely concerened with the Hypostatic Union, especially considering the whole “brutally tortured for espousing beliefs regarding the union” aspect of his career).

Anyway, I think it’s all a neat little package.  After some initial misgivings, I find that I like Eriugena quite a bit, especially his conception of the Fall, which I briefly discussed above, and his idea of the Incarnation.  Actually, his entire soteriological system is pretty cool, although I wouldn’t recommend reading Eriugena for the novice, he’s pretty difficult.  Word.

Life Notes

As you can probably tell from my lack of posting and the post I ended up writing, I’m pretty consumed with school right now.  All that ends in about a month and I’ll be running into finals (which should suck pretty hard) soon.  I’m staying in Chicago and (hopefully) learning German and working this summer.  I may also be trying to brush up on my Latin on my own.  If all goes well I’ll be able to pull of the whole “finish languages” plan by the fall quarter.  Considering that means I will have learned three languages (ok I already sort of knew 2) in a calendar year, I’m pretty impressed with myself (although hopefully not counting my chickens before they’ve hatched).

In more immediate news, I’m headed back to Bowdoin next week for graduation…hopefully I’ll be able to give and after action report of sufficient hillarity.

Bill Simmons has a pretty good Podcast about the Wire here.  Normally I would have just put this on tumblr but it was in a pop up so, yeah, weirdness.

I know I haven’t posted in awhile…sorry.  Here’s a joke to make you feel better:

What’s worse than finding a worm in your apple?

A triple homicide.

Well, not quite. I’m just giving up on this whole twittter thing. It sucks.

In other life news, my Bowdoin trip was fantastic. Much fun had by all and I managed to only wake up once with a penis drawn on my neck. Good times. Photos on flickr.

No playlist for tonight’s show, I’m basically just going to freelance it due to too much work.  However, expect to hear stuff from my two newest cds: Brother Ali and the Talib/Madlib collaboration.

The Brother Ali is pretty solid, although no tracks have really blown me away thus far.  The Talib is good but nothing spectacular as well.  Check it out 

            My new favorite movie, you ask?  XXX: State of the Union.  It’s awesome.  It joins that rare pantheon of movies where the sequel surpasses the original (Terminator 2, Aliens, maybe The Godfather 2) – never mind how shitty the original was.  A script entirely composed of shitty one-liners, as if every character is monologuing staccato style? Check.  Xzibit ‘pimping’ a tank to turn it on the Capitol Building? Check.  A guy whose last name is Steel?  Check.  Willem Dafoe as a villain and Samuel L. Jackson a badass?  A car that jumps onto a train track, loses its wheels, and then rides the rims on the track going 160 MPH?  Falling off a bridge and breaking your fall with a rocket launcher?  The bad girl actually gets shot?  Thawed meat to confuse the heat-sensitive tracking devices?  Love it.  And it’s great watching Vin Diesel die the offstage death dished out to actors who refuse to return for a shitty sequel (Guy running in with piece of paper – “Xander Cage was killed last night in Bora Bora!”).

And to Wedge – I was mentioning less well-known trailers, hence no Spiderman 3.  But on the subject, it’s about damn time we got Venom.  Hell, I even think Topher can pull it off.  Of course even that won’t stop me from hating him for his name.  My only question is how CGI-heavy Venom is going to be.  And if Mary Jane’s carpet matches the drapes.

I’m also excited for Miami Vice.  I’ve read the mixed reviews, but my dad bought the show on DVD and it actually stands the test of time pretty well.  Minus the pastel suits and cheesy music (except “In the Air Tonight” by Phil Collins, obviously), the show is basically nothing but machismo.  There are guns, boats, cars, a pet alligator, and a duo who constantly get in face-offs and never blink.  So as long as the movie gives me good ol’ badass, I’ll be happy.

This is epically fucked up…thank God this guy is gone in like three months.

Father First, Senator Second (Washington Post)

In his Senate office, on a shelf next to an autographed baseball, Sen. Rick Santorum keeps a framed photo of his son Gabriel Michael, the fourth of his seven children. Named for two archangels, Gabriel Michael was born prematurely, at 20 weeks, on Oct. 11, 1996, and lived two hours outside the womb.


Upon their son’s death, Rick and Karen Santorum opted not to bring his body to a funeral home. Instead, they bundled him in a blanket and drove him to Karen’s parents’ home in Pittsburgh. There, they spent several hours kissing and cuddling Gabriel with his three siblings, ages 6, 4 and 1 1/2. They took photos, sang lullabies in his ear and held a private Mass.

“That’s my little guy,” Santorum says, pointing to the photo of Gabriel, in which his tiny physique is framed by his father’s hand. The senator often speaks of his late son in the present tense. It is a rare instance in which he talks softly.

He and Karen brought Gabriel’s body home so their children could “absorb and understand that they had a brother,” Santorum says. “We wanted them to see that he was real,” not an abstraction, he says. Not a “fetus,” either, as Rick and Karen were appalled to see him described — “a 20-week-old fetus” — on a hospital form. They changed the form to read “20-week-old baby.”

You want some fucking movie reviews?  Fine.  But they’re going to be belligerent.

 

Clerks 2 – Funny.  More?  Fine.  Kevin Smith’s vulgar yet believable banter is hilarious.  Most of the other elements of the movie aren’t as great, but lucky for us the fantastic arguments about ass-to-mouth and porchmonkies make up the majority of the film.  Whenever Smith tries to be serious, he becomes both unoriginal and uninteresting.  He picks the cheesiest accompanying music, he dramatically pans from solemn face to solemn face, and oh look, the little girl waves through the window at a forlorn Dante.  Lame.  But then donkey-fucking returns and all is good again.  I’m too lazy to look up the actors’ real names, but Dante still acts as poorly as he did in the first one (his line delivery makes me want to beat him in the head with the cue cards he’s reading off of), but this is entirely made up for by the great job done by Randall.  The supporting cast is pretty solid too, except for creepy Mrs. Kevin Smith.  All in all, I liked the movie a lot.  Instead of just rehashing itself, it took the time to legitimately try to see how these people would be (marginally) different several years down the road.  And if you came to the movie for any other reason that uproarious dialogue, you’re an idiot.

 

Aeon Flux – I don’t know how this movie ended up in my house, but I woke up this morning and it was on the table.  So I watched it.  I won’t bother you with things such as plot, acting, or the like as it’s all as you’d expect.  It’s got your run-of-the-mill tragedy, love, twist, and final stand.  The only thing that really gives it any merit at all is its attempt to be creative.  Some of the stuff is actually pretty cool: the lady with hands for feet, pills to give you messages or missions within your brain, little explosive marbles, etc.  But the action isn’t all that exciting and “themes” or any semblance of deeper meaning is come across as more retarded than the kid who lives down the street from me and eats his hat.  Ultimately I wish this movie had been worse.  If it had been shittier it could have been a great B-movie (dare I say a Starship Troopers), but as it is it’s a ho-hum forgettable sci-fi flick.  Much like my sex life.  Well, minus the sci-fi and flick part.

« Previous Page